AP: Texas |
|
|
|
|
Denton, Texas
|
Customize | Make This Your Home Page | E-mail Newsletters | MySpecialsDirect |
|
News/Home
Local
Sports
Business & Technology
Entertainment
Opinion
Weather
Classifieds
Archives
Obituaries
Let Us Know
Business Chronicle
Education
Break
RoomFood/Recipes
Home/Garden
Pets
Travel
Health/Science
Texas/Southwest
Texas Legislature
Washington/Politics
Nation
World
Special Projects
Columnists
AutomotiveLottery
GuideLive
News Feeds/RSS
Special Sections
|
Court rules UT can block on-line dating e-mails
08/03/2005
The University of Texas didn't violate the constitutional rights of an online dating service when it blocked thousands of unsolicited e-mails, a federal appeals court panel ruled Tuesday.
White Buffalo Ventures, which operates LonghornSingles.com, had appealed to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, saying it had complied with all anti-spam laws.
The company argued that the university violated its constitutional rights by filtering out 59,000 e-mails in 2003. White Buffalo also claimed a federal act that allows certain e-mails superseded the university's anti-spam policy.
The 5th Circuit panel found that the federal anti-spam law, CAN-SPAM, does not pre-empt the university's policy and that the policy is permissible under the First Amendment.
The law requires messages to have a title that correctly states the contents of the e-mail, a valid address and that companies honor requests to unsubscribe.
The court did not need to rule on whether the state university e-mail servers are public or private.
The Austin-based service had legally obtained the addresses from the university, but the university started blocking the e-mail messages saying White Buffalo was part of a larger spam problem that had crashed the computer system.
The university said it was also responding to complaints from students and faculty.
At the time, UT issued a cease and desist order, but White Buffalo refused to comply. So UT blocked all the e-mail messages from White Buffalo's IP address.
The court determined that White Buffalo complied with federal law, that its e-mails were not illegal, but the law applies to UT as it would to an Internet service provider that employs protection measures.
This text is invisible on the page, but this text is affected by the invisible item's flow. This text is invisible on the page, but this text is affected by the invisible item's flow.
|
Advertising |
|
|
||
Table
of Contents
| |||||