• |
  • Member Center
  • |
  • Make This Your Home Page
  • |
  • Subscribe to the Newspaper
Weather: Partly Cloudy, 87° F
>




Comments  | Recommended

Court sides with Argyle on billboards

Appeal ruling says cities have rights to make rules about large outdoor signs

07:12 AM CDT on Tuesday, May 20, 2008

By Peggy Heinkel-Wolfe / Staff Writer

An appellate court has agreed that cities can make rules about billboards, even in their extraterritorial jurisdictions, overturning on Friday a lower-court ruling in a long-running case between Argyle and Clear Channel Outdoor.

DRC file photo
DRC file photo
This billboard on FM407 sparked a lawsuit between Argyle and Clear Channel Outdoor. An appellate court ruled Friday that cities can make rules about billboards, even in their extraterritorial jurisdictions.

Argyle town attorney Matthew Boyle said that, although the case isn’t finished, he was pleased that the Second Court of Appeals agreed that prohibiting billboards was not the same as taking someone’s property rights.

“We’re confident in the town’s position to be able to enforce a sign ordinance in the town’s extraterritorial jurisdiction — where clearly that sign is,” Boyle said.

Clear Channel did not return a call Monday for comment.

Clear Channel and the original property owner, David Pierce, first sued Argyle in December 2003 over the town’s ordinance that expressly forbids billboards.

 Argyle had cited both parties the month before for violating the ordinance by erecting the billboard on FM407, almost a mile away from Interstate 35W.

Some of the dispute between Argyle and Clear Channel has focused on whether towns, in general, could make such rules governing extraterritorial jurisdictions and whether specifically the Clear Channel sign was built in Argyle’s extraterritorial jurisdiction.

Argyle has followed the lead of many Texas cities that have banned either new billboards or any altogether, to eliminate visual clutter and encourage economic development.

Federal laws have helped cut back on the proliferation of billboards for years, beginning with Lady Bird Johnson’s campaign to beautify and clean up roadsides and the Highway Beautification Act of 1965.

Legislatures in Alaska, Hawaii and Maine have passed bills that banned billboards altogether.

Boyle said that the court’s opinion wasn’t the final disposition of the case; instead, it was sent back to the original trial court.

“Even if its [the court’s] opinion is not appealed, this wasn’t the full and final closure of the case,” Boyle said.

PEGGY HEINKEL-WOLFE can be reached at 940-566-6881. Her e-mail address is pheinkel-wolfe@dentonrc.com .

 

Print E-mail this article Forums

Create A Screen Name

Screen names can only consist of letters and numbers.
Your screen name will appear to everyone.
NOTE: You cannot change, delete,
or edit your screen name once you hit "Save".


Check to see if this screenname exists Cancel Screen Name Form

Leave Comment
Conversation guidelines: We welcome your thoughts and information related to this article. When leaving comments please stay on topic and be respectful of others.

You must be logged in to contribute. Log in | Register Now!

You are logged in as screenname | Log Out

You are logged in, but do not have a "screen" name. Create a Screen Name

Showing:




Report item as: (required)
Comment: (optional)
Print E-mail this article Forums

News on Demand RSS
E-Mail newsletters

Advertisement
Most Popular Stories